29/11: In brief: a word on the CNN/YouTube debate
Category: Campaign 2008.7
Posted by: A Waco Farmer
Huckabee: smooth. He is clearly the most articulate, clear-headed public speaker of this crew. No one in public life explains the interconnectedness between faith, politics, and culture better than Huck.
Romney: slippery. His refusal to answer the planted "gays in the military" question was tortuous. He has a tough time explaining his Massachusetts past. Anderson Cooper's pointed follow-up was as devastatingly illustrative as Hillary's notorious stumble in Philadelphia.
Rudy: straightforward. The guy has no capacity to tell anything but the truth. He has no filter. He will answer as honestly as possible any question you ask of him. I love Rudy--but can a man with this fatal political flaw ever win the presidency?
Ron Paul: haunting. In your heart you know he is right. If it wasn't for Iraq, we would love him. If it wasn't for Iraq, the media would hammer him, and we would have never heard of him.
Fred: halting. He is a rough speaker. Good on the issues (and tall)--but still not ready for prime time. Is he getting better? Maybe a little? Or do I just want him to be getting better?
McCain: tragic. He is a great American--but if "he keeps on talking to the people who don't listen, who does he think is going to hear?" I like McCain. The great mass of Republicans disagree with me. Next.
Duncan Hunter: unfortunate. He deserves better than this. Too bad.
Romney: slippery. His refusal to answer the planted "gays in the military" question was tortuous. He has a tough time explaining his Massachusetts past. Anderson Cooper's pointed follow-up was as devastatingly illustrative as Hillary's notorious stumble in Philadelphia.
Rudy: straightforward. The guy has no capacity to tell anything but the truth. He has no filter. He will answer as honestly as possible any question you ask of him. I love Rudy--but can a man with this fatal political flaw ever win the presidency?
Ron Paul: haunting. In your heart you know he is right. If it wasn't for Iraq, we would love him. If it wasn't for Iraq, the media would hammer him, and we would have never heard of him.
Fred: halting. He is a rough speaker. Good on the issues (and tall)--but still not ready for prime time. Is he getting better? Maybe a little? Or do I just want him to be getting better?
McCain: tragic. He is a great American--but if "he keeps on talking to the people who don't listen, who does he think is going to hear?" I like McCain. The great mass of Republicans disagree with me. Next.
Duncan Hunter: unfortunate. He deserves better than this. Too bad.
martian mariner wrote:
So...do you guys think that this is an honest change, or harbinger of change, in the way we do politics, or is this just window-dressing in just another stuffy old guy attempt to look hip?
BTW, I generally avoid candidates before the Conventions, because I'm proud to be registered Independent (which in TX anyway means I can't vote until Nov.). That said, all of these guys seem pretty lame. Heck, from his article in Foreign Affairs, Rudy seems downright dangerous. Oh, that's fun, let get one-word takes on these guys: Rudy - dangerous; McCain - old; Fred - poser; Huckabee - genuine; Romney - stooge; Hunter - who?