<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Bosque Boys</title>
    <link>http://bosqueboys.com/</link>
    <description>history, politics, religion, entertainment</description>
    <language>en-us</language>           
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.22</generator>
    <copyright>Â©</copyright>             
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title>On Patriotism</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1751</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i><b>pa·tri·ot·ism </b><br />
<br />
n.   Love of and devotion to one's country. </i><br />
<br />
Samuel Johnson famously pronounced "patriotism...the last refuge of a scoundrel."  While one might impute a number of possible meanings to that famous saying (the 1775 context for the assertion is not extant), modern skeptics of American history and government oftentimes interpret this observation as a general caution against <i>extreme </i>patriotism.<br />
<br />
The other day I entered into a discussion with a Progressive friend who professed a profound admiration for his country.  <br />
<br />
Why is America great?  <br />
<br />
What engendered feelings of national pride in his heart?<br />
<br />
1.  America FINALLY recognized the equal rights of all its citizens regardless of race.<br />
<br />
2.  America FINALLY recognized the worth of its female citizens, although, he was quick to add, we could not bring ourselves to put this development in writing (ERA).<br />
<br />
3.  America FINALLY stood up to defend the rights of African Americans, ninety-odd years after initially according those rights.<br />
<br />
4.  America FINALLY seemed to be stepping forward to combat poverty, hunger, and AIDS in less fortunate parts of the world.<br />
<br />
My reaction: those are all good things, no doubt--but I could not shake the sense that they were also condemnations in the guise of faint praise.  They all struck me as a bit grudging and back-handed.  The rhythmic "FINALLY" seemed to me gratuitously ubiquitous.<br />
<br />
Was he saying America was a pretty crumby country while we allowed slavery?  Were we a pretty lousy nation for the ninety-nine years after outlawing slavery in which African Americans faced egregious discrimination?<br />
<br />
Granted, slavery, racism, and sexism were (and are) bad things--but do the American blemishes overshadow the triumphs?<br />
<br />
If I were going to tell our story, I think I would begin with the great and positive impact the United States of America made on the history of the world--and, then, for some balance, I would talk about some of the ways in which we fell short of our own aspirations.  But I might also note that we often judge the American past against present standards, which, ironically, would not be the accepted benchmarks of civility and equality--if not for the United States of America.<br />
<br />
My point: to lead with our flaws may be factual, strictly speaking, but it is also misleading.  This is not the way we would introduce a friend or a loved one.  Generally, in our relationships with people we like, we do not dwell on the very worst aspect of their personalities.<br />
<br />
We don't say: "This is my colleague.  He is a recovering alcoholic."  It may be true and an impoprtant component of who he is--but, if this is a friend whom we admire, that part of his life taken alone does not accurately convey his story.<br />
<br />
<b>America, right or wrong.</b><br />
<br />
My Progressive friend also took a moment to inveigh against the notion of "America, right or wrong," which he construed as a simplistic statement of blind and unquestioning allegiance to US policies and actions.<br />
<br />
I have long wondered at this interpretation of that particular expression of support.  Do people consciously misconstrue this straightforward and heartfelt expression of patriotism?  I know my friend to be a person of good will and sincerity, so I will accept his construction as an honest difference of opinion, but what is so offensive about a pledge of unconditional love for the United States of America?  Why do some listeners always seem to hear that phrase with such radical ears?<br />
<br />
Would he have trouble with this statement?<br />
<br />
"My wife, right or wrong."<br />
<br />
Would you necessarily assume that I am asserting that my wife is always right?  Or wouldn't you more rationally assume that I am saying that my wife is right sometimes and wrong sometimes (and I reserve the right to debate those matters with her privately)--but I support her (especially in public) regardless.  Why?  Because she is my wife, and I love her unconditionally.  I have made a vow before God and man to love her in sickness and in health.<br />
<br />
I love America unconditionally.  I love America when George Bush is president.  I love America when Bill Clinton is president.  I will love America when Barack Obama is president.  I often disagree with the policies of my government, and I reserve the right to debate those policies within our system of self government--but I continue to love America.<br />
<br />
Unconditional love does not mean blind faith and unquestioning allegiance, but an unconditional love is definitely part of "the bonds of affection" and the "mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battle-field, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearth-stone, all over this broad land," which, spoken of long ago, continues to unify and uplift.<br />
<br />
May God Bless America.]]></description>
 <category>From the Heart</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1751</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:16:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Zimbabwe Has Descended into Hell</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1750</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031975/The-Dirty-Half-Dozen-The-generals-ruthless-bloodthirsty-Mugabe.html"><b>This</b></a> is what happens when the checks on power are gone.  The unscrupulous grab power and keep it by whatever means they choose.  Without an armed citizenry it can happen anywhere.<br />
<br />
And notice China's role.<br />
<br />
Story from <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html"><b><i>The Mail Online</i>.</b></a>  Link from <a href="http://www.theospark.net/"><b><i>Last of the Few</i></b></a> .]]></description>
 <category>America and the World</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1750</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 5 Jul 2008 10:31:46 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>On the Much Lighter Side</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1749</link>
<description><![CDATA[A friend sent me these jokes.<br />
<br />
When I die, I want  to die like my grandfather--who died Peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming  like all the Passengers in his car.' --Author Unknown<br />
<br />
Advice for the day:  If you have a lot of tension and you get a headache, do what it says on the  aspirin bottle: 'Take two aspirin' and 'Keep away from children.' --Author  Unknown<br />
<br />
'Oh, you hate your  job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called  EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar.' --Drew Carey<br />
<br />
'The problem with  the designated driver program, it's not a desirable job, but if you ever get  sucked into doing it, have fun with it. At the end of the night, Drop them off  at the wrong house.' --Jeff Foxworthy<br />
<br />
'If a woman has to  choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will  choose to save the infant's' life without even considering if there is a man  on base.' --Dave Barry<br />
<br />
'Relationships are  hard. It's like a full time job, and we should treat it like one. If your  boyfriend or girlfriend wants to leave you, they should give you two weeks'  notice, there should be severance pay, and the day before they leave you, they  should have to find you a temp.' --Bob Ettinger<br />
<br />
'My Mom said she  learned how to swim when someone took her out in the lake and threw her off  the boat. I said, 'Mom, they weren't trying to teach you how to swim.''  --Paula Poundstone<br />
<br />
'A study in the  Washington Post says that women have better verbal skills than men. I just  want to say to the authors of that study: 'Duh.' --Conan  O'Brien<br />
<br />
'Why does Sea World  have a seafood restaurant?? I'm halfway through my fish burger and I realize,  Oh my God....I could be eating a slow learner.' --Lynda  Montgomery<br />
<br />
'I think that's how  Chicago got started. Bunch of People in New York said, 'Gee, I'm enjoying the  crime and the poverty, but it just isn't cold enough. Let's go west.''  --Richard Jeni<br />
<br />
'If life were fair,  Elvis would be alive and all the Impersonators would be dead.' --Johnny  Carson<br />
<br />
'Sometimes I think  war is God's way of teaching us geography.' --Paul  Rodriguez<br />
<br />
'My parents didn't  want to move to Florida , but they turned sixty and that's the law.' --Jerry  Seinfeld<br />
<br />
'Remember in  elementary school, you were told that in case of fire you have to line up  quietly in a single file line from smallest to tallest. What is the logic in  that? What, do tall people burn slower?'<br />
--Warren  Hutcherson<br />
<br />
'Bigamy is having  one wife/husband too many. Monogamy is the same.' --Oscar  Wilde<br />
<br />
'Suppose you were an  idiot. And suppose you were a Member of Congress.. But I repeat myself.'  --Mark Twain<br />
<br />
'Our bombs are  smarter than the average high school student. At least they can find  Afghanistan ' --A. Whitney Brown<br />
<br />
'You can say any  foolish thing to a dog, and the dog will give you a look that says, 'My God,  you're right! I never would've thought of that!'' --Dave  Barry<br />
<br />
Do you know why they  call it 'PMS'? Because 'Mad Cow Disease' was taken. -- Unknown, (presumed  deceased)<br />
<br />
   'Everybody's got to  believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.' --W. C.  Fields]]></description>
 <category>Frivolity</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1749</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:57:54 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>To Independence: Happy 4th of July!</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1748</link>
<description><![CDATA[I cannot do better today than  <a href="http://www.britsattheirbest.com/002125.php"><b>this post</b></a>  at <i>Brits at Their Best.</i><br />
<br />
Fly the flag.]]></description>
 <category>American History and Politics</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1748</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:33:08 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Speculation and Oil Prices</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1747</link>
<description><![CDATA[In an <a href="http://www.bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1691"><b>earlier post</b>, </a>I raised the question as to whether speculation in oil futures were at least partly to blame for high oil prices.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Blame_146_oil_on_speculators_US_House_told/articleshow/3194455.cms"><b>This article</b></a> affirms that it is.]]></description>
 <category>America and the World</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1747</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:38:13 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>TORTURE!?!</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1746</link>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens, no shrinking violet when it comes to forcefully addressing the threats posed by Islamism in the modern age,<b><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all"> describes “waterboarding” today in <i>Vanity Fair</i></a></b> as a brand "of barbarism that [one] might expect to meet at the hands of a lawless foe who disregarded the Geneva Conventions."<br />
<br />
After subjecting himself to the terrifying ordeal of "controlled simulated drowning" at the hands of some patriotic Americans skilled in the procedure, Hitchens notes that reasonable and honorable people disagree over whether the extreme intelligence tool is efficient and/or moral.<br />
<br />
For his part, however, Hitchens provides a gripping account of his own experience and a compelling argument against "waterboarding," which he sees unequivocally as <i>torture</i>.  It is worth the read--as Hitchens makes cogent arguments well worth considering:<br />
<br />
--is the "ticking time bomb" model a slippery slope to worse brands of torture?<br />
<br />
--does all this secrecy really serve American interest?  Doesn't anybody with an internet connection know all the top secret details there are to know anyway?  Couldn't the American government do better honestly confronting these accusations and wild rumors?<br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all">Read it.</a> </b><br />
<br />
Two quick notes:<br />
<br />
--Hitch (whom, for the record, I like very much; in fact, he may be my all-time favorite atheist communist) brings up the old saw that confessions yielded from "waterboarding" may contain inaccuracies.  Hitch notes that the information extracted from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed did not prove to be "wholly reliable."<br />
<br />
The bottom line: the information from KSM produced from his interrogation proved invaluable--no one contests that point.  Was it all invaluable?  Maybe not.  But doesn't that miss the bigger point.  When a terrorists starts spewing information--are we not much happier with the leads that turn out accurate than we are disappointed with the ones that do not pan out?<br />
<br />
--Hitch also notes:<br />
<br />
“'waterboarding'” [is] something that Americans [have been doing] to other Americans [for many years]. It was inflicted, and endured, by those members of the Special Forces who underwent the advanced form of training known as sere (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape). In these harsh exercises, brave men and women were introduced to [this brand of <i>torture </i>as a method of preparing for captivity among our worst enemies]."<br />
<br />
My cousin, a retired Marine Corps sergeant and currently a young executive (he sometimes comments as "a Farmer's cousin"), reminded me recently that he endured this preparation exercise (SERE training).  Needless to say, he did not enjoy it.  However, the point is that he survived it, as thousands of American military men have.<br />
<br />
"Waterboarding" is undoubtedly horrible (just ask Hitchens, or a farmer's cousin, or KSM), but there is a palpable distinction that the mainstream media perpetually (willfully?) miss: Americans undergo "waterboarding" on a regular basis as part of their training.  No one would ever suggest that we stick bamboo under the fingernails of American servicemen--but for years we have "waterboarded" them.<br />
]]></description>
 <category>National Security</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1746</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:58:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>The University of Michigan at the Outbreak of the Spanish-American War</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1745</link>
<description><![CDATA[Photognome has sent <a href="http://www.vaughan.org/bios/vcv/vcvmem10.html"><b>this link</b></a> to a memoir by a latter19th/early 20th century doctor and professor.  The link connects to the chapter on the Spanish-American War.<br />
<br />
Here are the opening paragraphs:<br />
<br />
<i>CHAPTER X - THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
After the sinking of the Maine in the harbor at Havana, the proclamation of war against Spain, and the call for volunteers, I was anxious to enlist; but having a wife and five children dependent upon me, I could not conscientiously do so. There was quite an outbreak of enthusiasm for enlistment among the students of the University of Michigan. President Angell was then in Constantinople as United States Ambassador to Turkey, and President Hutchins, who later became permanent President, was acting in that capacity. One day he came to me and said that the students were all astir about the war, wanted to hold a mass meeting with speeches, and might be stampeded into enlistment. He advised that the mass meeting be permitted, that representatives of the students be invited to talk, and that the older and wiser members of the Faculty pour the oil of caution upon-the troubled waters of youth. As dean of the Medical School I was asked to attend the meeting and to do my part in allaying and cooling the enthusiasm and patriotism of the students. Reluctantly I consented to do my small share in this work. <br />
<br />
University Hall was crowded. Even the students who made speeches, for the most part at least, evidently had been selected from among those most likely to be moderate in speech. I sat on the platform and listened to talk after talk by my older and wiser colleagues. One admonished the students that their first duty was to their parents, that they should not enlist without consulting them, and that they had parents distributed from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Another said that the student's first duty was to the University, that if he enlisted he interrupted his course of study, would probably not be able to regain his place in his class, and would suffer delay in graduation. A third told the students that there were enough unemployed in this country to fill the quota called for by the President, advised waiting until the unemployed had enlisted, and if it appeared that the ranks were not filled by these, enlistment by the students might be considered. I had promised President Hutchins that I would be at least moderate in my speech and I went to the meeting fully determined that I would comply with my promise. I have long known that in speaking I labor under a serious defect, but I had no realization until that night of the extent to which this defect dominates and determines my actions. Whatever I may intend to say, when I am to make a speech, when I actually begin to talk, I always give expression to my convictions. Many a time I have gone before an audience intending by my words to palliate and to compromise, but after I begin to talk I have always been led by my convictions rather than by my intentions. At the mass meeting I was called upon to follow the colleague who had spoken of filling the ranks with the unemployed. This drove me into a mental frenzy, and standing before the audience, I said: "God pity the country whose tramps must fight its battles; it is true that you are here to acquire an education with the purpose of fitting yourself for the work of life; but I would rather see these walls crumble into dust than to see you hesitate to go when your country calls. You have duties towards your parents, but your first duty is to serve your country." Along this line I rushed on in a verbal flood until my time limit was reached. <br />
<br />
The next afternoon Governor Pingree, in his office at Lansing, called me by telephone, informed me that he had read my speech, had signed my commission, and that I would report for duty at Camp Alger, Virginia, without delay. Some enlist because they like the soldier's life, some for patriotic reasons, but I received my commission at the outbreak of the Spanish-American War because I talked too much. </i><br />
<br />
]]></description>
 <category>American History and Politics</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1745</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:54:33 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>The Up Side of the Downturn</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1744</link>
<description><![CDATA[An economic downturn like we are experiencing currently is not all negative. Here are three positives <br />
<br />
(1)Housing Prices are down and housing sales have slowed.  This is bad news if you are a seller, and perhaps devastating news if you are a speculator (unless more tax-payer bailouts* occur); it is not bad news for every one.  If you are a first-time buyer, perhaps a young newly married couple, then that house just got more affordable.<br />
*Strictly speaking there is no such thing as a "government bailout."  The government has no money.  A "government bailout" means the government has decided to use our money to bailout someone.<br />
<br />
(2)The Stock Market is down.  Bad news if you are retired and depending on investment income, or near anticipated retirement; it is not necessarily bad news if you are younger.  The Stock Market decline means that stock is now more affordable.  In other words your dollar goes farther on Wall Street.  If you are 35 and beginning a savings program, for example, you now can afford more stock each month that may repay you well in the future.<br />
<br />
(3)Gas prices are high.  This hurts everyone except the wealthy, directly at the pump and indirectly through increases in the price of everything.  But, there is a silver lining.  Maybe, just maybe, our country will get serious about energy independence, increasing our national security.  And, maybe, just maybe, we will improve environmental quality by moving away from internal combustion engines.]]></description>
 <category>Thinking Out Loud</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1744</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:53:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>McCain versus Obama</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1743</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Blackfive</i> <a href="http://www.blackfive.net/main/2008/07/why-mccains-cap.html"><b>compares the two</b></a> from the perspective of martial virtues.]]></description>
 <category>Politics</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1743</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:34:16 -0400</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Episcopal Confusion</title>
 <link>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1741</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Episcopal Church, the American branch of Anglicanism, is in disarray.  While most of the press goes to the issue of Episcopal support for same-sex marriage and practice, there are other symptoms of sickness.  Like confused priests and bishops.<br />
<br />
Take the Episcopal priest who converted to Islam.  The Rev. Ann Holmes Redding, when converting to Islam, might have been expected to renounce her Christianity, and cease to be an Episcopal priest.  Do not expect such clear thinking by Episcopal priests.  She decided she wished to be both Christian and Muslim, and continue in her office.  Her bishop, Geralyn Wolf, might have been expected to remove Redding's credentials.  Again, do not expect such clear thought from an Episcopal bishop either.  Instead, Wolf placed her under pastoral direction, which was recently extended. On the plus side, this "pastoral direction" is described as being a time of reflection during which Redding is not to exercise priestly functions.<br />
<br />
<i>Bishop Wolf described the priest as a woman of utmost integrity and said her interactions with her remains open and mutually gratifying.</i><br />
<br />
You can't make this stuff up.<br />
<br />
That flushing sound you hear is the mainline American churches heading down the crapper.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.livingchurch.org/news/news-updates/2008/6/24/bishop-wolf-extends-pastoral-direction-for-muslim-priest"><b>Story.</b></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/4193/"><b>Statement</b></a> from Bishop Wolf.]]></description>
 <category>Mainline Christianity</category>
<comments>http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=1741</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:11:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>